Decision Making and Moral Judgment in Adolescents and Young Adults

نویسندگان

چکیده

Introduction: Decision-Making (DM) is a process aimed at selecting one or more response options, while Moral-Judgment (MJ) defined as the evaluation decision through which agent approves disapproves of intentional actions in physical and/or psychological harm caused to people. Social cognition tries study bases human development DM and MJ dual process, where emotion jointly participate. Objective: The objective this was adolescents young adults. Methodology: Columbia Card Task (Figner et al., 2009), evaluates DM, Young’s Moral Judgment task (Baez 2015), were used evaluate MJ. Results: results suggest that take greater risk than adults emotional cognitive tasks, even increasing their choices compared task. Regarding MJ, consider negative consequences positive action inappropriate though there no intention cause harm, reaction being emotional. adults, they when clear intent despite fact consequence not negative, reasoned. Conclusion: These allow for an comprehensive way, taking into account everyday life both interact carry out choice adolescence adulthood.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Decision-Making Under Risk in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Adolescents often make risky and impulsive decisions. Such behavior has led to the common assumption that a dysfunction in risk-related decision-making peaks during this age. Differences in how risk has been defined across studies, however, make it difficult to draw conclusions about developmental changes in risky decision-making. Here, we developed a non-symbolic economic decision-making task ...

متن کامل

Judgment and Decision Making:

(probably none of whom agrees with everything in the chapter).

متن کامل

Judgment and decision making.

The study of judgment and decision making entails three interrelated forms of research: (1) normative analysis, identifying the best courses of action, given decision makers' values; (2) descriptive studies, examining actual behavior in terms comparable to the normative analyses; and (3) prescriptive interventions, helping individuals to make better choices, bridging the gap between the normati...

متن کامل

Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.

Three studies test eight hypotheses about (1) how judgment differs between people who ascribe greater vs. less moral relevance to choices, (2) how moral judgment is subject to task constraints that shift evaluative focus (to moral rules vs. to consequences), and (3) how differences in the propensity to rely on intuitive reactions affect judgment. In Study 1, judgments were affected by rated agr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Psychology

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['0033-3077']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.145045